Supreme Court of India questions ban on entry of women in Sabarimala temple

SC questions ban on entry of women in Sabarimala temple

The Supreme Court on Monday questioned the age-old ban on entry of women of menstrual age group in Sabarimala temple, saying it was a public temple and everyone needed to have “the right to access”. At best, there can be religious restrictions and not a general restriction, the bench said.

“It is our view that the temple cannot prohibit entry except on the basis of religion. Unless you have a constitutional right, you cannot prohibit entry,” a bench led by Justice Dipak Misra said as it asked the Kerala government and the temple administration to justify the ban on the principles of constitutionality.

During the brief hearing, the bench asked the government whether it was sure that no woman have entered the temple premises in the last 1,500 years.

Senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Kerala government, said that the women who have not attained menopause cannot “preserve the purity” during the 41-day journey to the temple, which is located on a hilltop.

The bench was hearing a PIL, filed by the Young Lawyers Association, seeking entry for all women and girls in the temple which, as a practice, does not allow girls who have attained puberty to enter the premises. However, women, who have reached menopause, are allowed.

The case will come for a detailed hearing on February 8.

1 Comment

Click here to post a comment

  • That’s the problem with learned idiots interfering with traditionally ordained prohibition by the then Pandithers and Sanantana Dharma followers who are the spiritual elders of the time.It has been like that for ages but these idiots are trying to change all that.It is a matter for the Hindu Devasthanam elders to decided and none else. The courts have no right to make any decision in the affairs of the temple. I strongly believe in that.