Quantcast

Why Does the West Treat Hinduism in a Condescending Manner?

Why Does the West Treat Hinduism in a Condescending Manner?



As a child, I moved around frequently. My parents emigrated from India to the U.S. when I wasn’t even five years old, and we moved from place to place. It seems that I’ve perpetually been stuck with the “New Kid Syndrome” for most of my life.

Unfortunately for me, the schools I attended weren’t ever very religiously diverse. Christians usually made up the vast majority of my peers. It was quite lonely for a little Hindu child like me not having anyone or anything to relate to. Ah, but then there was always Social Studies – my favorite subject. No matter what book we learned from, India was mentioned. As the second most populated country in the world – it had to be. Finally, something I could relate to! With the mention of India always came mention of Hinduism, the religion my family practiced. I always looked forward talking about Hinduism in school because I was almost always the only Hindu around, which instantly made me exotic and the center of attention.

“Wow, cool! There are all these cool-looking gods and goddesses with so many heads and arms! You really believe in all of them?” kids would ask me.

Hey, wait a second, there’s not really more than one God. And why are Shiva, Vishnu, Saraswati, and Lakshmi being referred to as ‘gods’ and ‘goddesses?’ The Bhagavad-Gita is mythology? Like Greek mythology? This doesn’t sound right…

This was an experience I dealt with many years ago, and interestingly enough many Hindus are still dealing with today: the misrepresentation and subsequent belittlement of Hinduism. For a religion as established and tolerant as Hinduism, it is disrespected in the West through other outlets than just public education. Through media and marketable fashions and trends, the face of Hinduism becomes no more than what is represented by many in the West, a “mythological,” pagan religion.

The first issue to address is the fact that many in the West, including scholars, refer to Hinduism as “mythology.” This is by far one of the most insulting descriptions to characterize the religion with. By describing Hinduism as mythology, one suggests that Hindu beliefs are simply a collection of folklore and tales, too fantastic to be real. In reality, all religions are theoretically mythological because no one religion can prove its validity. Can Christians prove that the word of The Bible comes directly from God? Can theyprove that the world was created in seven days? No, but even so Christianity’s core beliefs are rarely described as myths. Rather, they are referred to as “teachings of Christ.” Why then refer to Hindu beliefs as myths and not just what they are also –beliefs? Perhaps in a part of the world where monotheistic religions rule, it is difficult to see truth in a religion with so many faces of God. It is simply easier to cast it off as a sensational belief system. Many don’t regard how insulting it is to Hindus to be told they believe in something that’s, frankly, false. We’re not asking for special treatment or a pretty, little pedestal, but it would be nice if we could stop with the mythology nonsense.

There’s also the issue of referring to the deities as “gods” and “goddesses” rather than “Gods” and “Goddesses”. Again, because the West is dominated by monotheistic religions, it seems nonsensical to give a respectful title to many forms that claim to be “God.” Major religions such as Christianity, Judaism, and Islam prevail in numbers of worshippers and they give claim to only one God. Although Hindus believe in one supreme entity, most don’t understand how there can be so many forms and therefore, they must be referred to as less important “gods.” What most don’t realize is that this is truly disrespectful to Hindus to have Shiva or Ganesha or Krishna referred to as a lowly god, when they serve as core representations of their faith.

As a journalist, I often refer to my AP Stylebook, as many editors require their reporters to follow guidelines set by the Associated Press. Unfortunately for me and other Hindu writers out there, it requires that we refer to these deities in lowercase form. Although because AP Style instructs to “lowercase gods and goddesses in references to the deities of polytheistic religions,” and Hinduism is not polytheistic, as many people assume, but actually polymorphic, I technically could capitalize “God” and “Goddess” when referring to any of the Hindu deities. I doubt, though, an editor would side with me on a technicality he believes to be minor. Of course – therein lies the problem – it is a minor technicality to those outside the religion and the exact opposite to those within.

Former AP reporter and current religion reporter for the San Antonio Express-News, Abe Levy says the rules probably won’t change because numbers usually rule, and the numbers unfortunately don’t lie with Hindus in the West, and he’s probably right (although even he makes the mistake of calling Hinduism polytheistic).




“I think the honest truth is that monotheistic faiths – the world’s largest three of Islam, Judaism and Christianity — share this belief in one God and so until polytheistic faiths in the U.S. break out of their minority status numerically and politically, it won’t change. Is that fair? No. It’s more of a pragmatic solution given the sheer numbers of Muslims, Jews and Christians and their stamp on U.S. history and culture.”

Some say ignorance is bliss – but I have to disagree (at least when it comes to religion). The problem with ignorance is that it usually leads to misconception, and that is definitely not bliss. Misconceptions in the hands of scholars and educators are just plain dangerous. Incorrect and misleading information about Hinduism has often been printed in textbooks and reference books. Public education is a powerful source of information, especially for young people learning about world religions for the first time. What happens when a Hindu child goes to school and reads, “Durga and Kali are terrible and extremely bloodthirsty forms of this goddess,” in a textbook like “The Ancient South Asian World” printed by the Oxford University Press? What about learning that The Mahabharata, an ancient Hindu scripture is described as being, “…like adventure movies of today [that tell] thrilling stories about great heroes” as described in Glencoe-McGraw Hill’s “Discovering Our Past – Ancient Civilizations” textbook? These are certainly not accurate statements about Hinduism, and what’s worse is that they are superficial. Jesus’ crucifixion is never referred to as a “gripping, emotional roller coaster” so why precede the description of a Hindu script with such an introduction? Furthermore, describing Durga and Kali with such adjectives as “terrible” and “bloodthirsty” paints vivid pictures in impressionable minds of demons and monsters like those right out of fairytales. Of course it’s understandable that Hindus and non-Hindus, alike, assume that Hinduism is a pagan religion when scholars describe important figures as elaborate, animalistic idols. Monsters can’t be worshipped as God, so the very idea of Hindu teaching seems ridiculous.

Dictionary.com’s description of Krishna is as “one of the most popular gods…[who is] worshipped in several forms [such as] as the divine cowherd whose erotic exploits, esp. with his favorite, Radha, have produced both romantic and religious literature.” The relationship between Krishna and Radha is one of pure, eternal love as described by Hindu scriptures, and to reduce it to an “erotic exploit” conveys it as simply a sexual relationship, in which Krishna is the hunk who gets all the girls. This description reduces a major form of God to human form, and worse, shows him in an especially bad light by making him sound like a flirt.

Jasneshwari Dev, a spiritual teacher at Barsana Dham Temple in Austin, Texas has written letters to book publishers and conveyed the Hindu community’s disappointment in such wrongful descriptions in hopes to promote better education of Westerners about Hinduism.  She says the description of Krishna is completely inappropriate and misleading.

“Using the word “erotic” to describe the love between Radha and Krishna shows the ignorance of the writer.  God’s love is beyond the conception of the human mind.  But Hinduism does teach us that God is beyond all such human emotions of lust, anger, greed, jealously.  The use of this word to describe God is highly offensive to Hindus.”

It’s interesting the fascination people have with fantasy and things that seem non-human and unrealistic. Hinduism again falls into this superficial category and over the years, it has become increasingly “cool” (and profitable) to use colorful images of Hindu figures and symbols on anything from T-shirts and home furnishings to even costumes and restaurant advertisements. Most have no idea what any of these images represent, but again the obsession with things that seem unreal prevails. And if it makes a product sell, then by all means go for it, right? Sadly, many would say “yes.”

This past summer in Spain, fast food giant Burger King revealed a new ad campaign depicting an image of Lakshmi sitting on a hamburger. The caption underneath translated to “This snack is sacred.” The image was used to increase Burger King’s profits and many Hindus saw it as sacrilege. It seemed to be a mockery and a sarcastic pun at the fact that most know that Hindus don’t eat beef.

Last year supermodel Heidi Klum, known for her extravagant Halloween parties, dressed to impress – in a Kali costume. While it was a very colorful and elaborate costume, it’s despicable that she would choose, once again, a very sacred figure to dress up as. How would Christians feel if someone showed up with an expensive costume depicting the Virgin Mary – or worse – Jesus Christ? Maybe it wouldn’t bother many, but what if the culprit were the last person in the world that should to be representing a pious, pure Mary or a humble, selfless Jesus? No one wants others badly representing something they hold dear, and Hindus are no different. Not to say Heidi Klum is a bad person, but she’s not even Hindu and who knows what kind of frolicking went on at her party?

Cafepress.com has a variety of fashions available with Hindu connotations to them, including a couple with the images of Ganesh and Shiva reading “Ganesh/Shiva is my Om Boy” playing off the popular slang term “homeboy” referring to a good friend. It’s funny and it’s cool looking, but I doubt most of the people wearing those shirts have any spiritual relationship with either God to lay claim to the phrase. But of course, that doesn’t matter most of the time.

Some might say these things aren’t big deals because many don’t mean any blatant disrespect, but what they don’t realize is the sheer disregard this shows for Hinduism as a religion deserving of respect. Small things have big impacts. Tolerance is stressed heavily in the West, but maybe empathy and education should be stressed more. Knowledge opens doors and it could be the key for Hinduism finally to receive more respect as the ancient, established, and welcoming religion it really is.

Senior and officer of The University of Texas’s chapter of The Hindu Students Council, Atul Agrawal says he believes that he sees hope for the future, but it will take dedication on the parts of many Hindus and non-Hindus, alike, to make a real difference of how Hinduism is viewed in the West.

“I believe the key thing to removing ignorance is subtlety. For example, yoga has hugely impacted Americans for health reasons. While many people do not divulge into where it originated or the deeper meaning, there are others who do. While the goal is to educate everyone, it has to be one step at a time.

~ Brown Girl

LIKE US ON FB & SHARE OUR PAGE WITH FRIENDS TO HELP IN SPREADING SANSKRITI.




Related Post

6 Responses to "Why Does the West Treat Hinduism in a Condescending Manner?"

  1. Nisheet  February 23, 2014 at 6:09 am

    very aptly written and is the sad truth.

    Reply
  2. Rajneesh kumar  February 23, 2014 at 1:01 pm

    If any one say that why ur gods have more than 1heads…. Simply U ask why” Can’t” has 2 meaning… Can and Not….. It should not exist(tease that person) ,English is a lol language ,….bla bla bla……. Just like 2 meanings are added for shortcut and to explain full in less time like that Gods are represented with more than one head to represent varios awtar r say rup.. In a single body…like that more that 2 hands represent..varios ways to solve any thing…..in a singe body….u cant show all ways to solve any condition in one hand….we also use diff techniques(some time we have to be hard(so trisul),some time calm(flower),sometime bless (so blessing pose)… It is only method to show….and it is the best method try to judge it…

    Reply
  3. Mick Goodman  February 23, 2014 at 8:48 pm

    Calling a religion a mythology is not an insult. As you stated, all religions are mythologies. It is not to say they are false, but they are collections of stories and symbols which best illustrate a particular view on the nature of being and the universe. I see mythology as being very powerful. It has an impact on our daily lives, how we live and view the world … and how we treat others.

    Also … I think Hinduism is very much respected in the West today. Certainly not by fundamentalist Christians, but many young (and old) people look upon Hinduism as source of great wisdom. The popularity of yoga may seem a fad to many, but it has kept a consistent following in the West for some time. For many it has become a way of life.

    Pranams,

    Mick Ramji Goodman
    Kansas City, MO USA

    Reply
  4. Kiran Bilakhia  June 21, 2014 at 3:21 pm

    I think the only way to quieten people is to practice our religion in its true spirit in India,amongst the Hindus ,without prejudice,and show the world what Sanatan Dharma can really achieve by showing fantastic results.This does not mean that non-hindus would be discriminated against as that is against Sanatan Dharma too.There would be no higher and lower castes,and everyone would be respected as fellow hindus and helped as part of the greater family.Charity as they say,begins at home.The country is developing and should continue to develop by embracing all hindu principles alongside,also learning from our history and all the sacrifices our great elders have made for us,and see how our Mother India holds up her crown in the world.I do not think we should ‘export’ our religion.I would like to see people queuing up to see how we have done it and the answer would be Sanatan Dharma.We should also not give away ideas from our ancients to the world for anyone to exploit and also criticise.That knowledge belongs to India for India.Ideally it is for all humanity but not at the cost of being destroyed . People should not be allowed to steal hindu ideals without them accepting where they originated!Lastly the hindus should shake off the colonial mentality,be confidant,and be able to communicate well and remember wherever we go we are ambassadors of our faith and country…make both of them proud of us.

    Reply
  5. SHREE  June 4, 2015 at 4:03 am

    Good article. Hinduism is not based on beliefs like Abrahamic religions. It is based on inquiry “Who am I ?” based on experiences. GOD in west and Devas of east have very different context. In west, GOD is seperated from the rest, like dead GOD. In east, GOD/Devas are living GOD, everything in the universe is part of GOD, so everything is GOD. with western mind set, it is hard for them to see GOD in others, even more difficult to see himself/herself. Moreover Hinduism is not a religion with set of beliefs (cult), it is a way of life. We need to bring this knowledge and awareness to westerners and middle easterners.

    Reply
  6. Kalyanaraman  June 5, 2015 at 6:18 am

    Neat write up. See, we are not worried if someone says two plus two is five as we know that it is wrong. Just because few say that it is five it won’t be true.
    Many accept the concept called ‘Model’ and they teach and use in academic work. Very funny to see that the same people could not see the description of concepts in our way of life are such models.
    One of the great scientists, Stephen Hawking, in his book Grand Design claims that there are only four forces. He tells that they are 1. Gravity, 2. Electromagnetic Force, 3. Weak Neuclear Force and 4. Strong Neucleur Force. While explaining, it is stated that the source of Granvity is unknown (I as a layman understand).
    Now, from Srimad Baghavadham we know initially four 1. Sanakar, 2. Sanandanar, 3. Sanathanar and 4. Sanathkumara (Collectively called as Sanathsujatha). From knowledgeable people I understand Sanaka means the ‘one that has no prior’ .
    Do they say that our knowledge is an analog model of what Stephen Hawking claims.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.