Quantcast

An open letter to Bollywood

An open letter to Bollywood



I am a citizen of India who was brought up on the staple diet of Hindi films. As a person who edited and published the first Hindi Film & Video Guide of Hindi Films – Collections in 1989 that saw 6 editions over next 8 years or so, I can claim to understand the industry thinking to a certain extent.

I saw many films with a sense of guilt as a Hindu when he saw that priests were nearly always greedy, lustful rotund people who didn’t mind raping a lady even in sacred temple precincts. I appreciated Rahim chachas, father Patricks and an alcoholic Anthony with a golden heart and felt deep in my heart why our despicable priests couldn’t be like them. I felt a pang of guilt when films lampooned or caricatured lovable Parsis.

I am sure, many of my age group would identify these films and characters easily. So, for people of our generation in their fifties and sixties a PK or a Haider fell into the same pattern and we were hurt but not agitated but don’t howl in protest. I too would have remained silent as I belong to a generation who were taught in schools under secular education system conceived by great leader with scientific temper, Mr. Nehru, that there was something basically rotten with Hindu society which resulted in horrors of caste, superstition, poverty that finally resulted in slavery under benign rule of Mughals and British.

Poor performance of economy was called ‘Hindu rate of growth’ though it was Nehru’s socialist rate of growth. Nehru’s half baked knowledge of history written in good English as ‘Discovery of India’ was the beacon light for history writers. The left secular hijacking of history under Indira Gandhi completed this sense of loathing for anything Hindu. If anything good like Yoga or Science was ‘discovered’ it was to be dissociated from Hinduism and presented as something that sprung up in spite of anti-human, inequality based Hindu dharma not because of its universal scientific philosophical system that encouraged open minded enquiry.

With this background we were not surprised or hurt but ashamed when we saw such archaic cliche ridden images of Hindus in movies. Of course, makers too came from the same social background so they also found it convenient to nurture ‘secular’ fabric of India. There were brave producers and directors who went deep into social evils of Hindu society with sensitivity. One can recall Chetan Anand, Bimal Roy, V Shantaram and Raj Kapoor amongst others. But, the ‘safe’ commercial formula ruled the roost.

With christening of Hindi film industry as ‘Bollywood’ this cleavage between west oriented film industry and traditional society became pronounced. Industry was no more rooted in Indian ethos. But, the embarrassment of being Hindus inspite of trying to exhibiting their western orientation didn’t go away. So, we saw a new breed of movies like OMG – Oh My God where Mithun caricatured, rather lampooned one of the most respected Guru Sri Sri Ravishanker for no rhyme and reason. We had Singham Returns where the villain was an incarnation of evil under the garb of a sanyasin or Guru. And then we had Haider and PK too.

These movies disturbed me but I kept quiet as a ‘good’ ‘modern’ Hindu. Unfortunately, the new self- confident aggressive generation that has seen rise of India as a power in technology and science cannot stand such a depiction. They are outspoken, blunt and impatient. So, many of them have spoken out, a few in a manner which is termed ‘lumpen’ by our social elite. Though, why such description is not used for violence by other religious followers is unfathomable.

Surely, Hinduism is most open to self criticism and self correction, so such movies should not lead to violence. There are better ways to register unhappiness and complain about being pushed around for being ‘good boys’. May be Hindus should have sent you ‘Get well soon’ cards like Munna bhai.




“What is wrong in pointing out wrongs in a society?” – hurt producer/directors ask. Right sir, but people probably find it wrong the way you do it. To my mind, the sense of hurt has less to do with pointing our wrongs in Hindu society, but the lack of balanced, secular approach to the problems of our society in throes of tectonic changes and sensitivity of all its communities.




You can take out a march and get a film banned that shows a padre lusting for a woman or a padre hungry for money. You can get a movie song removed or a large chunk of movie cut because it hurts the sentiment of Muslim community due to perceived threat of violence. One can get a TV serial banned just because it is written by Tasleema Nasreen. But, nary a cry of freedom of speech! You keep quiet about this naked threat to freedom of speech.

Whatever PK wished to convey, could have been conveyed using different religious practices. E.g. if going to temple is out of fear, but then so is going to church or offering namaz. (it is a different issue that ‘God fearing’ is an English term, Hindus have no such term, it is ‘Prabhu premi – God loving). If pilgrimage is superstition, it is so for all religions. If so called godmen are spreading superstition what are ‘changai sabhas’ or ‘miracle sessions’ of evangelists?

Vishal, coming to your laments about ‘freedom of speech’ and his fear of security, he refuses to acknowledge that he showed Indian army in poor light. He showed atrocities on Kashmiri Muslims but failed to amplify that this was one of the consequences of barbarian ousting of Kashmiri Hindus and an attempt to separate Jammu & Kashmir from India.

No sensitive director in his right mind would use one of the most sacred temple to film dance of devil there. A Hindu like you, Mr. Vishal, would never have dreamt of shooting this song against the backdrop of a Church or a Mosque and rightly so. But, Hindus are ‘good boys’ and can withstand any misrepresentation in the name of liberty.

No government can allow any part of its land to be cut off like this. Army was doing its duty in a very tough and hostile terrain during this critical time. To demoralize and demonize it and show it in poor light is almost an act of treason to the national cause. Remember, for India, J&K as an integral part of India is proof of its secular credentials. Do jawans need no sympathetic hearing?

Please talk to army men and hear their side of the story too before passing off such anti-national presentation as cinematic liberty. Perhaps you could take a leaf out of Hollywood movies whom you love to hate but whom Bollywood copies shamelessly. They produce macho movies to cover up their embarrassing disasters of their Vietnam and Iraq etc. Here our secular Bollywood converts even successful campaigns into embarrassment.

A recent article in The Guardian on 25th December, 2014 asks- “Why is Hinduism the driving philosophy from Interstellar to Batman to Star Wars?” Writer, Nirpal Dhaliwal quotes Petar Rader, the producer of first Matrix movie, “It’s a yogic movie. It says that this world is an illusion. It’s about maya- that if we can cut through the illusions and connect with something larger we can do all sorts of things.” But before Nolan, before the Matrix, before, even, the iPad, there was Star Wars.

It was the film, with its cosmic scale and theme of a transcendental “force” which opened up mainstream American culture to Indian esotericism more than anything else. A philosophy to which many are keen to subscribe is what makes religions successful. But, alas, Bollywood has no balls or brains to understand the supreme beauty of Hinduism and use it to produce movies that could enlighten the society. So, they keep raking up the rancid old muck and recycling the same crap formulae to rake in their moolah.

Let right to freedom of speech be equal for all – whether somebody wishes to criticize Hindus or any other religions, or wishes to draw an image of naked Hindu gods and goddesses or prophets; or question birth of Jesus, or be dissenter of any faith; or for one wishing to lampoon character of charlatans of any faith.

John Stewart Mills noted more than a century back that, ‘your liberty to swing your fist ends where my nose begins’. This is the basic principle of responsible social liberty and democracy. I request Raju Hirani and Vishal Bhardwaj and his Bollywood ilk not to bloody the nose of Hindus to show off their liberty.

~ Ratan Sharda, citizen Journalist, Author, Marketing Consultant by profession and a keen observer of the country’s political scenario.

 

LIKE US ON FB & SHARE OUR PAGE WITH FRIENDS TO HELP IN SPREADING SANSKRITI.




Related Post

16 Responses to "An open letter to Bollywood"

  1. Rad  January 8, 2015 at 5:15 am

    Wah bhai! Could not have said it better myself.

    Reply
  2. drmits  January 8, 2015 at 8:10 am

    Amazing refreshing article. Believe or not – Subconscious mind catches all good and non-sense things what we see, hear and feel by all senses. Movies makes mindset of people over long run. Need of time is responsible censorship department, organized united hindu organization all over bharat to sync all aspects of sanatan dharm. Jay shree ram.

    Reply
  3. Sameer  January 8, 2015 at 10:53 am

    Well what you say is true But I have just One question why is it that people are saying that PK has hurt the religious sentiments of Hindus when there are other religions also shown in that movie? then again people say they would not mind or protest if Pk or other movies were also made show other religions issues etc, I fail to understand how their feelings would not be hurt if say a Father or Imaam were shown to be a villain for eg then it would not hurt the hindu feelings if then the priest was to be shown likewise??? Protest all you like we may support you if we agree with you but why link other religions to your protests? Like wise from the articles and post on many sites it was clear the only hurt was that other religions were not shown in the same light as hinduism but none was debating what was shown as wrong so I fail to understand what the issue is? is it that the other religious feelings are not hurt and hence the hindus are hurt or is it that facts are shown and hence feelings are hurt????

    Reply
    • Ravi Kiran  January 9, 2015 at 5:42 am

      Other religions were also shown? What was shown about other religions? Was terrorism shown? Was stoning women for blasphemy shown? Was circumcision shown? Was polygamy shown? Was pedophilia of imams shown? I mean seriously! What was shown about the shortcomings of other religions? Look, we are open to criticism. Surely show us the shortcomings of our way. But at the same time show about the shortcomings of other religions as well. Pk conveys a msg that there are flaws in Hinduism and Hinduism only. That is our problem.

      When you are smart enough to understand that showing imams as villains hurts your sentiments, how do you not understand that the same thing goes the other way around as well? I mean, that our sentiments were hurt right now.

      And your conclusion is totally wrong. We are not hurt because other religions were not shown in the same light. We are hurt because we were shown in this light. Also without any research done on it what so ever.

      The question of other religions comes when the crew of the movie claims that it is showing the shortcomings of SOCIETY. Now shortcomings of society implies shortcomings of all religions must be shown.

      Reply
    • Om Prakash Sharma  January 9, 2015 at 2:11 pm

      The bias is the only issue and that is sufficient because you know you have restricted to a small area of the present India from an India spanning from Arabia to Indonasia. Of course some of us too have become like our tormentors and cunning like the Evangelicals

      Reply
  4. Karthik  January 8, 2015 at 12:13 pm

    Awesome ! Aptly conveying many’s thoughts including me…

    Reply
  5. Sheetal  January 8, 2015 at 2:43 pm

    This must reach every HINDU…or ppl who are calling themselves spiritual but not religious…they should understand being spiritual means being Hindu..contemplate!!!

    Reply
  6. Aman Arora  January 8, 2015 at 4:03 pm

    You nailed it sir.

    Reply
  7. Piyush Paliwal  January 8, 2015 at 4:51 pm

    bingo … Agree fully

    Reply
  8. Vinay Agarwal  January 9, 2015 at 2:36 am

    Beautifully written balanced article. As mentioned in article, I am hurt by showing only one side. In the name of secular, educated and modern Hindu, we are tolerating beyond a point. Bollywood is disconnecting the Hindu youths from their religion as they are learning only from Movies. I feel very sorry for our next generations.

    Reply
  9. Jay Mehta  January 9, 2015 at 4:06 am

    Hello Ratan ji, great article, thanks for putting it together.

    I share your feelings and frustration. I think there is a great need to have a Hindu cultural think tank group who can challenge such acts and take it to the end until they are cornered. We are almost a billion in population with merely any recognition worldwide. We have many cultural organization but none is effective or serious in pursuing and making significant difference in preserving our culture or religion. Pl suggest if there is such group of intellectuals, I would be interested to join.

    Thanks again and I would encourage to write more on such subjects.

    Best Regards
    Jay

    Reply
  10. Nageswara Rao  January 9, 2015 at 1:11 pm

    I don’t agree with your logic, I have seen many movies in Hindi as well as vernacular where, Hindu priests were shown in very high esteem, saving Heroes or their families losing their lives, and there are many English movies where Church Fathers even Pope was shown as Villains,
    Film is an artistic medium, while I am hundred percent against lampooning of Gods in films in the guise of comedy as far as spiritual Gurus what is wrong if they are lampooned with all these Aharam Bapus Nityanandas prowling in the world, Can you show me a spiritual Guru who wears Khadi Dhoti and walks to travel, you Go to any Airport and catch a Plane you will see our Gurus,literally in the most lavish silks,pampered by their Sishyas, Religious tolerance is not wrong, Nehruvian Socialism was absolutely right in it’s time which may not be today,
    IF SHOOTING ON CHARLIES OFFICE is to be hated and to be protested, so is Karina’s morphed Photo by VHP goons

    Reply
  11. Nageswara Rao P  January 9, 2015 at 1:17 pm

    Hinduism does not need any think tanks nor any supporters like VHPs Bajarang Dal, if they want to use Hinduism for their own ends, They will definitely pay for that in their spirits, Hiranyakashyap to Ravan all used Hinduism but never Did Rama or Krishna teach intolerance it is these upstarts and narrow minded people like these authors who think, they are born to take care of Hinduism, NO NO NO,
    HINDUISM DOESN’T NEED THEM AND DOESN’SUPPORT THEM

    Reply
  12. Om Prakash Sharma  January 9, 2015 at 2:04 pm

    I am sorry Sir. They are not willing to listen to reason. They listen to money which comes to them through public and Dawood

    Reply
  13. Vidyadhar Mishra  January 9, 2015 at 6:38 pm

    Nice to note that Hindus are finally waking up from their long lumbering sleep. They can now see that secularism was more an hypnotism than a reality. One always wondered why the Nehru and Gandhi dynasty always been anti Hindus and why did Mahatma Gandhi gave all his support to them. A time will come when Hin dus will realise that the Congress rule has been a curse to Hindus and perhaps worse than the MUghal rule.

    Reply
  14. Amrita  January 10, 2015 at 1:58 pm

    Mr. Nageswara Rao I am a devotee of Swami Nithyananda ji. Come closer to Him to know the truth.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.