History

Ghosts of 1962: Leaked military report blames Nehru and an ill-prepared army for defeat by China

Ghosts-of-1962-Leaked-military-report-blames-Nehru-and-an-ill-prepared-army-for-defeat-by-China

The truth about India’s military defeat at the hands of the Chinese in 1962 is finally out in the open.

The long suppressed classified Henderson Brooks report blames Jawaharlal Nehru’s ‘Forward Policy’ and an ill-prepared army for the debacle.

A large section of the report, completed in 1963 but never released on the grounds that it contained sensitive operational details, was recently posted by Australian journalist Neville Maxwell in his blog.

Ghosts

The report states that the ‘Forward Policy’ of Nehru’s government, aimed at preventing the advance of the Chinese in disputed areas of Ladakh and the erstwhile North East Frontier Agency (NEFA) through aggressive patrolling and establishing additional border posts, “certainly increased” the chances of a conflict and the plan was executed by the army headquarters “without necessary backing” in the form of additional troops and equipment.

The Forward Policy was conceived at a meeting chaired by Nehru on November 2, 1961, and attended by defence minister Krishna Menon, foreign secretary M.J. Desai, Army Chief General P.N. Thapar and Intelligence Bureau director B.N. Mullick.

In a scathing attack on the civilian and military leadership of the time, the report states, “the government who politically must have been keen to recover territory,advocated a cautious policy; whilst Army Headquarters dictated a policy that was clearly militarily unsound”.

The report prepared by Lieutenant General Henderson Brooks, who was commanding a corps at the time, and Brigadier P.S. Bhagat, commandant of the military academy, draws on contemporary military and intelligence documents to show that the Chinese had been strengthening their position in Tibet years before hostilities erupted in October 1962. The role of Nehru’s handpicked

Lieutenant General Brij Mohan Kaul comes in for ruthless scrutiny in the entire report.

“So far effort has been made to keep individual personalities out of this review, General Kaul, however, must be made an exception, as for now on, he becomes the central figure in the operations and important signals and orders from him are on a person to person basis, both to higher as well as lower formation commanders,” said the report which is also critical of the role played by one of his confidants, Brigadier D.K. Palit who was director of military operations.

Nehru’s other confidant, IB chief Mullick, comes in for criticism for advising the government that the Chinese would not react to the Forward Policy by using force even if they were in a position to do so.

Image result for 1962 china war

“Military planning and posture were thrown overboard. Lt. Gen. Kaul, unheedful of the military situation and unmindful of the essential requirements of the troops, rushed 7 Infantry Brigade into Dohia area.

Once committed in the area, he refused to redeploy the troops, although he had the time, the authority and the discretion to do so,” said the report questioning his decision-making.

Commenting on general preparedness, the report said Indian officers and men were unfamiliar with Chinese tactics, their weapons, equipment and capabilities.

The report went on to comment that the general staff and Kaul should not have allowed themselves to be pushed into a military adventure without the requisite forces.

The defence ministry kept the report under wraps and turned down repeated demands for making it public. Even now, Maxwell’s revelation is less than 200 pages of the voluminous report.

2 Comments

Click here to post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • There is a reasoning that the Chinese in ’62, seeing an ill-clad and equipped Army with a dubious leadership at the helm, wanted to do blitzkrieg, for a corrider to the Bay. However, seeing adamant resistance at some postions by the Armymen they learnt that it would be difficult for them to hold-on to their gains and thus was born the concept of CPEC.

  • The contents of this report is no secret except to the subsequent generations. I was in Delhi when this was happening, had reliable reports on this, for some strange reasons, Nehru could not contain the arrogant, conceited V.K.Krishna Menon (Defence Minister and confidant). Menon sacrificed that military genius, Gen. Shiv Varma to enable the inefficient Kaul become chief and all disaster followed. And when India had lost a huge chunk of territory in the Aksaichin area, Nehru had the temerity to tell the Indian Parliament, ‘Not even a blade of grass grows there’ to which the parliamentarian Mahavir Tyagi retorted ‘ and on your bald head also’. Bottom-line, Nehru and the Congress have a lot to answer for our problems in Kashmir and with China, time Modi exposed the truth in a parliamentary discussion and straightened our records.

Like us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

css.php
More in History
Winston-Churchill-was-no-less-than-Hitler,-he-killed-millions-of-browns-and-blacks-alike
Winston Churchill was no less than Hitler, he killed millions of browns and blacks alike

It was Churchill, whose policies led to...

2,700 Year Old Yogi in Samadhi Found in Indus Valley Civilization Archaeological Site
2,700 Year Old Yogi in Samadhi Found in Indus Valley Archaeological Site

The 2,700 year old skeletal remains of...

Harappa-like-ancient-site-excavated-in-Tamil-Nadu,-3,000-artifacts-discovered
Harappa-like ancient site excavated in Tamil Nadu, 3,000 artifacts discovered

Our ancient histories recorded in the Puranas...

New Evidence Dates Harappan Civilisation To 6000BCE
New Evidence Dates Harappan Civilisation To 6000BCE

Kolkata: Climate change was probably not the...

Close